The UK government is pushing forward with a major benefits reform push, aiming to cut £5bn from welfare spending by 2030. Prime Minister Keir Starmer insists the changes are necessary, despite mounting opposition from within his own party.
Speaking to reporters, Starmer defended the reforms, arguing the current system “is not working” for taxpayers or those needing support. He stressed that those unable to work would still receive protection, but those who can work must be encouraged to do so.
However, dozens of Labour MPs oppose the plans, particularly changes to Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Critics argue the reforms unfairly target disabled people and low-income families.
Under the proposed reforms:
- PIP eligibility will tighten, requiring proof of higher support needs.
- Frequent reassessments will increase, though severe cases will be exempt.
- A 13-week transition period will apply before benefits are withdrawn.
The government estimates up to 1.3 million people could lose some financial support. An official impact assessment warns 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, may fall into poverty.
Many Labour MPs remain unconvinced. Dr. Simon Opher dismissed the transition period as “not very much really,” arguing it doesn’t change the core issue—reducing disability payments.
Some backbenchers are prepareing to rebel in the upcoming vote. One MP said the reforms risk “hurting the most vulnerable” without addressing systemic issues.
Conservative shadow minister Alan Mak accused Labour of “rushed cuts” due to economic mismanagement. He called for a more “thoughtful” welfare reform approach.
Meanwhile, the Lib Dems oppose PIP restrictions entirely. Spokesperson Calum Miller argued savings should come from broader system reforms instead.
With the vote looming, Starmer faces a balancing act delivering on fiscal promises while preventing a damaging party split. The benefits reform push will test Labour’s unity and its commitment to welfare fairness.
For more political updates, visit London Pulse News.
