The UK government faces a critical legal warning. Notably, a top planning lawyer declares approval unlawful. This opinion concerns China’s proposed new embassy. The site is London’s historic Royal Mint building. Consequently, a major diplomatic and legal clash is unfolding.
Therefore, Lord Banner KC issued this critical legal warning in a strong legal opinion. He is a highly respected King’s Counsel. His submission arrived just before the final deadline. Opponents of the plan commissioned this document. These opponents are local residents. They fear China, now their landlord, may force them out. Therefore, they are fighting the proposal vigorously.
Moreover, China plans to create a “mega embassy.” This would be the largest of any nation in Europe. It would replace their current, much smaller premises. However, the application process is deeply controversial. Crucially, China has redacted parts of its plans. Sections describing room uses are greyed out, which constitutes a critical legal warning about transparency concerns.
However, former Housing Secretary Angela Rayner called in the decision. Therefore, the current Secretary, Steve Reed, now holds the power. He must make the final ruling by October 21st. Lord Banner’s advice is clear for him. The government cannot lawfully grant permission based on redacted plans. The potential uses of secret rooms are vital for planning assessment. This includes structural and safety implications.
Furthermore, a major security concern exists. China wants a public area on the site. This area would show ancient ruins and a heritage centre. However, the Foreign and Home Offices object strongly. They warn of specific public order and national security risks. However, protesters could enter, but police could not due to diplomatic immunity. China offered a conditional solution for emergency access. Nonetheless, Lord Banner dismisses this assurance. He states it would not be enforceable under international law.
Furthermore, Hong Kong dissidents and pro-democracy activists express deep fear. They worry redacted rooms could hide interrogation spaces. China’s consultants defend the secrecy. They argue embassy projects are different from others. They cite the undisclosed US embassy plans in Nine Elms, which also faced a critical legal warning about transparency issues.
Residents and security experts urge the government to reject the plans. The residents’ association threatens a humiliating judicial review. They believe the legal opinion strengthens their case immensely. The critical legal warning must prompt the government to weigh complex planning rules against serious security concerns and diplomatic relations. The final decision will have major international repercussions.
For more political updates, visit London Pulse News.
