A senior judge has expressed deep concern over remarks made during Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) regarding the potential settlement of Gazans in the UK, warning that such political rhetoric could undermine the country’s commitment to international asylum laws.
The exchange in Parliament saw the Prime Minister assert that the UK would not be a destination for displaced individuals from Gaza, instead emphasizing regional solutions. The judge, speaking anonymously due to judicial impartiality rules, described the comments as “deeply troubling”, cautioning that political discourse should not preempt legal obligations on asylum.
Opposition parties and human rights organizations were quick to condemn the remarks, with Labour and the Liberal Democrats accusing the government of “lacking compassion” in its response to the humanitarian crisis. Amnesty International also raised concerns, stating that “asylum decisions must be based on legal principles, not political convenience”.
In response, Downing Street defended the Prime Minister’s position, stressing that the government remains focused on humanitarian aid and diplomatic efforts rather than resettlement. A spokesperson reiterated that “the UK’s priority is ensuring support reaches those in need as close to their homes as possible”.
The controversy has reignited debate over the UK’s asylum policies, with growing calls for the government to clarify its stance on accepting refugees from conflict zones.
For more political updates, visit London Pulse News.
