The Reform UK election expenses row has taken a dramatic turn after a councillor reported his own colleagues to the police. Ed Hill, a Reform UK member, accused fellow councillors Neil and Tony Stevens of exceeding campaign spending limits.
Neil Stevens allegedly spent £170 over the legal limit in his Alphington and Cowick campaign. The spending cap for the ward was £1,827.04, but his expenses reportedly reached £1,995.72.
The Reform UK election expenses row has exposed deep divisions within the party. Hill claims he acted to uphold transparency, saying he promised voters accountability. However, Reform UK dismissed him, accusing him of bringing the party “into disrepute.” Meanwhile, Neil Stevens insists he misunderstood the rules, believing only his personal contributions counted toward the limit.
Rob Sheridan, Neil Stevens’ election agent, said he was “confident” no errors were made. He added that third-party checks were conducted and further reviews are underway. Tony Stevens, whose own campaign included a £250 podcast expense, declined to comment.
The Reform UK election expenses row could have significant consequences. Neil Stevens won his seat by just 72 votes, while Tony Stevens secured victory by a mere 22 votes.
Devon and Cornwall Police confirmed they are assessing the allegations. The Electoral Commission, which oversees campaign finance, may also take action. Reform UK’s national office said an internal investigation is ongoing but refused further comment.
This scandal adds to growing scrutiny of Reform UK’s financial practices. The party made major gains in Devon’s local elections, becoming the council’s second-largest group. However, the Reform UK election expenses row threatens to undermine its anti-establishment image.
As the investigation continues, questions remain over whether overspending influenced close races. Critics argue the controversy highlights the need for stricter campaign finance enforcement.
For more political updates, visit London Pulse News.
