The UK government is reportedly reviewing plans to reduce funding for GB Energy, the state-owned renewable energy company established by Labour to drive the transition to clean energy and lower household bills. The potential cuts, set to be discussed in June’s spending review, could significantly impact the company’s long-term goals.
GB Energy was initially allocated £8.3 billion over a five-year period, forming a key part of Labour’s strategy to “supercharge” Britain’s clean energy sector. However, the company received only £100 million in its first two years, raising concerns about its future development. This move follows a wider government review of spending priorities, particularly in light of the decision to increase investment in defence.
One proposal under consideration involves redirecting £3.3 billion from GB Energy towards low-interest loans for local authority-led renewable projects, such as solar panel installations and community wind farms. Despite Labour’s manifesto commitment to fully funding GB Energy, neither the Treasury nor the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero have guaranteed the original funding package will be maintained.
A government spokesperson insisted that GB Energy remains central to the UK’s renewable energy ambitions, stating, “We are fully committed to GB Energy, which is at the heart of our mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower.” However, sources suggest that while funding levels may remain unchanged, budgets from other green initiatives could be merged under GB Energy’s umbrella to allow for departmental cuts elsewhere.
The speculation has renewed talk of tensions within Labour’s leadership, particularly between No 10, the Treasury, and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. Last year, Labour had already scaled back its wider green investment plan from £28 billion per year to under £15 billion, dealing a setback to Energy Secretary Ed Miliband’s vision for net-zero policies.
Some industry insiders warn that reducing GB Energy’s budget could damage investor confidence, particularly in Scotland, where the initiative has been well-received. One source noted, “Scaling it back would be electoral madness. GB Energy has the potential to be a real confidence booster for business and is hugely popular on the doorstep.”
The company is also facing internal challenges. Last month, GB Energy admitted it could take up to 20 years to reach its goal of employing 1,000 people. Jürgen Maier, the former Siemens UK boss and current chair of GB Energy, has not committed to a timeline for lowering energy bills, raising further questions about the company’s impact in the short term.
Recruitment has also been a hurdle, particularly for securing a permanent chief executive to lead its Aberdeen headquarters. The city, historically associated with the UK’s oil and gas sector, is set to house GB Energy’s operations as part of a broader effort to transition the workforce into renewables.
Recently, the government appointed Dan McGrail, head of the renewable energy trade body RenewableUK, as the company’s interim chief executive. McGrail has taken on a six-month contract and will oversee operations from Aberdeen while the search for a long-term leader continues.
The UK government has projected that GB Energy will employ between 200 and 300 people at its Aberdeen headquarters over the next five years. However, questions remain over how the company will develop amid ongoing budgetary pressures and policy debates within the government.
With the spending review approaching, the fate of GB Energy hangs in the balance. Any significant reduction in funding could reshape the UK’s renewable energy ambitions, testing the government’s commitment to its clean energy goals.
For more updates stay tuned to London Pulse News.
