The UK’s independent terrorism watchdog has endorsed the decision not to classify Axel Rudakubana, the individual responsible for the Southport murders, as a terrorist. The review, led by Jonathan Hall KC, argued against broadening the definition of terrorism to include extreme violence carried out by isolated individuals, stating that such a move would be counterproductive. Hall emphasized that the current legal definition of terrorism, which requires violence to advance a political, religious, racial, or ideological cause, is sufficiently wide and should not be expanded further.
The review, initiated by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper in January, highlighted the potential risks of extending the definition of terrorism. Hall warned that doing so could lead to unintended consequences, such as limiting freedom of expression and overburdening counter-terrorism resources. He noted that while individuals like Rudakubana—described as “loners seeking notoriety through online violent material”—pose a genuine threat, their actions do not align with the established criteria for terrorism.
Rudakubana was sentenced to a minimum of 52 years in prison for the murders of three girls and the attempted murders of eight other children and two adults during a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport in July 2024. Despite the severity of his crimes, his actions were not classified as terrorism under existing laws. Hall acknowledged the challenges in monitoring such individuals, particularly when they lack a clear extremist ideology. Rudakubana had been identified as a potential risk three times by the Prevent counter-terrorism program but was ultimately removed from monitoring due to insufficient evidence of extremist motivations.
The review recommended that police adopt strategies inspired by counter-terrorism efforts to better address the threat posed by lone actors. Hall suggested developing a specialized policing approach to distinguish between online threats and real-world attack planning. He also called for legislative changes to address gaps in the law, such as introducing whole-life sentences for individuals who plan mass killings not motivated by terrorism. Currently, preparing for a non-terror attack is not a criminal offense unless it reaches the stage of an attempted act.
The report also examined the role of social media in spreading misinformation and complicating public communication following attacks. A government spokesperson acknowledged the findings and confirmed plans to amend legislation to address the identified gaps. Additionally, a public inquiry into the Southport tragedy will be established to further investigate the incident.
Hall’s review underscores the importance of balancing public safety with the protection of civil liberties, particularly in an era where digital platforms amplify threats and misinformation.
For the latest updates, visit London Pulse News.
