Andy Burnham has faced accusations of being “anti-London” amid a growing political dispute over government funding and devolution.
Sir James Cleverly, a senior Conservative politician, accused the Prime Minister of favouring Manchester over London. Cleverly said Burnham’s devolution plans could shift power and money toward Greater Manchester.
Cleverly made the comments after announcing his decision to leave the Conservative front bench. He plans to campaign for the London mayoral election.
Speaking to LBC, Cleverly claimed Burnham had adopted an “anti-London agenda”. He also accused the Prime Minister of reducing funding for London councils.
Cleverly argued that London remains vital to the UK economy. He said the country cannot achieve strong growth without a successful capital.
The dispute follows changes to local government funding. Under the government’s fairer funding review, some London councils could receive smaller settlements.
The government says the reforms will correct an outdated funding system. Ministers argue that some wealthy areas received excessive government support while poorer communities faced greater financial pressures.
Labour has defended the changes. The party accused the Conservatives of damaging the economy during their time in government.
Burnham’s wider devolution programme aims to give more powers to regions outside London. Greater Manchester has become a major example of this approach.
Critics, however, question whether stronger regional government should come at London’s expense. Cleverly believes London needs a stronger political voice during the changes.
He also argued that London could play a key role in helping the Conservatives return to power. He pointed to Boris Johnson’s 2008 mayoral victory as an example.
According to Cleverly, Conservative success in London could improve the party’s national prospects.
Labour rejected the criticism and said it remains committed to economic growth across the country. The party also highlighted its policies on housing, policing and public services in London.
The political dispute therefore raises a wider question: Is Andy Burnham really anti-London, or is he simply pushing a stronger devolution agenda?
Burnham’s supporters would argue that regional investment can strengthen the entire UK. Critics believe London should not lose resources to fund other areas.
The debate is likely to continue as the government expands its devolution plans.
